News Summary
During its recent meeting, the Austin Public Safety Commission voiced significant concerns about the police complaint process, particularly regarding the appointment of Kevin Masters as the new Complaint Supervisor. Commissioners highlighted the need for unbiased oversight and transparency in handling complaints against officers, revealing discrepancies in complaint resolutions. The discussion emphasized frustrations over the current complaint management practices and the necessity for improved investigation processes. The OPO’s reports on disciplinary actions have also come under scrutiny, prompting calls for better accountability measures.
Austin – The Austin Public Safety Commission raised significant concerns during its latest meeting regarding the oversight of the police complaint process. The discussion particularly focused on the appointment of Kevin Masters, a retired police officer with 27 years of service at the Kansas City Police Department, as the new Complaint Supervisor for the Office of Police Oversight (OPO).
Commissioner Rebecca Bernhardt voiced her apprehensions about Masters’ appointment, emphasizing the need for an unbiased perspective in handling complaints against officers. This meeting was characterized by heightened tensions, ultimately leading to the postponement of the much-anticipated 2023 annual report presentation from the OPO.
Several commissioners expressed their frustrations regarding the complaint management processes currently in place. A significant point of contention arose around the majority of complaints being categorized as requests for supervisor referrals that are redirected to the Austin Police Department (APD) for internal resolution. This practice raises questions about the lack of thorough investigations into complaints.
The chair of the commission, Nelly Paulina Ramírez, raised crucial questions about the clarity around supervisor referrals, highlighting concerns about whether individuals filing complaints understood that such a request would preclude formal investigations. Masters clarified that complainants often have differing expectations; some prefer a full investigation, others just want a supervisor notified, while some simply wish to document their experiences.
Upon closure of complaints, individuals receive a summary of the investigation process without access to specific evidence, such as body camera footage. Ramírez criticized this policy, arguing that transparency and access to evidence should be integral components of the complaint resolution process.
Moreover, Masters confirmed that all complaints from the year 2024 have been made publicly accessible online. The OPO is also actively working on addressing complaints from early 2025 and tackling a backlog of complaints from 2023. Gail McCant, the OPO Director, admitted there is a “reporting gap” due to a lack of accessible demographic and sector data associated with complaints. A potential new case management system is being explored to help rectify this issue.
The Public Safety Commission also discussed the Community Police Review Commission, which operates independently from both the OPO and APD, and is responsible for making policy recommendations. McCant described the upcoming 2023 annual report as a “year of transition,” with a focus on fostering impartial oversight aimed at enhancing collaboration and integrity rather than opposition.
In light of unresolved concerns, the commission has planned for a follow-up discussion. The OPO allows for complaints and feedback regarding police interactions to be submitted through various methods, such as phone, email, in person, or by mail, and anonymous complaints are thoroughly investigated as per Masters’ assurance.
The report released by the OPO revealed that in 2023, there were 578 complaints registered against officers, with only 11 resulting in disciplinary action against the involved personnel. This discrepancy has fueled criticism directed at the OPO regarding delays in releasing essential information and documentation pertaining to disciplinary actions.
The Austin Police Oversight Act was established following community demands for greater police accountability post-protests against police violence nearly two years ago. It mandated the formation of a Community Police Review Commission, which has yet to convene its first meeting. Current legislative efforts in the Texas Legislature are raising alarms among community members, who fear these measures could undermine local policies established by the Oversight Act, potentially increasing secrecy around police misconduct.
As the landscape surrounding police oversight in Austin continues to evolve, the Public Safety Commission remains dedicated to addressing the complexities of the police complaint process and ensuring accountability measures are effectively established and implemented.
Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic
HERE Resources
Hutto Ranked 13th Fastest-Growing City in the U.S.
Hutto, Texas Expands Investment in Surveillance Technology
Hutto Expands Surveillance with Flock Safety Cameras
Austin Plans to Dismantle Bike Lanes Amid Resident Concerns
Texas Lottery Faces Serious Mismanagement Allegations
Leander’s After-School Programs Face Controversy with YMCA Deal
Additional Resources
- Austin Monitor: Public Safety Commission Clashes with Office of Police Oversight
- Wikipedia: Police Oversight
- Community Impact: Austin’s Police Oversight Office to Host First Public Open House
- Google Search: Austin Police Oversight Office
- CBS Austin: State Bills Could Subvert Austin’s Police Oversight Act
- Google Scholar: Police Oversight Act
- Austin Chronicle: Two Years After Voters Approved Austin Police Oversight Act
- Encyclopedia Britannica: Austin Police Oversight
- KXAN: Austin Offices of Police Oversight Debuts First-Ever Open House
- Google News: Austin Police Oversight Open House
Author: STAFF HERE GEORGETOWN
The GEORGETOWN STAFF WRITER represents the experienced team at HEREgeorgetown.com, your go-to source for actionable local news and information in Georgetown, Williamson County, and beyond. Specializing in "news you can use," we cover essential topics like product reviews for personal and business needs, local business directories, politics, real estate trends, neighborhood insights, and state news affecting the area—with deep expertise drawn from years of dedicated reporting and strong community input, including local press releases and business updates. We deliver top reporting on high-value events such as the Red Poppy Festival, Georgetown Swirl, and Christmas Stroll. Our coverage extends to key organizations like the Georgetown Chamber of Commerce and the Downtown Georgetown Association, plus leading businesses in manufacturing and tourism that power the local economy such as local wineries and historic downtown shops. As part of the broader HERE network, including HEREaustin.com, HEREcollegestation.com, HEREdallas.com, HEREhouston.com, HEREgeorgetown.com, and HEREsanantonio.com, we provide comprehensive, credible insights into Texas's dynamic landscape.
